Saying the war in Iraq is good, because of our 'service to the Iraqis', is illogical because you're justifying the war with a reason that was NOT the original pretext for invasion. You can't just arbitrarily change the reason for fighting when you realise your old reasons had no validity.
So basically we should pull out of there and submit to defeat? That Al' Sadar guy is trying to rise to power, and he has ties to Osama Bin Laiden. Even if the war was started for wmds, and Kerry supported it and if he was president would have gone to war also. We took down Saddam, and gave the Iraqis more freedom, then being oppressed by a dictator such as Saddam. Were technically rebuilding the place, is that illogical?