Actually, many people believe, and rightly so, that the evidence presented isn't enough to convict anyone, even though it's very obvious he did it. Circumstantial evidence is rarely ever enough to convince a jury, but ... like I said it's pretty obvious.

I had similar questions concerning the 2nd degree murder charge. It makes very little sense to me.

And as for my newly acquired mantra: The media only gives what the public shows interest in.