I'm going to have to assume -- or hope -- that you make this stuff up just for the "What the hell?" reaction it gets out of the rest of us, Future. Logic would dictate that anything not written into a story or implied within a story by its writer(s) -- or stated or implied by them in an interview -- isn't there. The writer(s) is/are their story's God. If they don't create it, it's not there.

Folks can create their own story based off an official one, sure, but it in no way has bearing on the canon of the official story, and I honestly don't see what place it has in discussions about the original story. Why bring such stories into discussions about the official story as though they apply?