Quote Originally Posted by Martyr
It's scientifically proven that Mozart wrote the best music because it literally can make you smarter to listen to it (Or something like that). He is probably (Though Beethoven is my personal favorite of those old classical artists) the most critically acclaimed classical musician of all time.

But other than him, classical music can neither be called superior or impossible to reproduce.

What I basically mean to say is that Mozart does not justify the impotence of Classical Music.
(Even though Mic Jagger justifies the immortality of Classic Rock)
I like classical music, but this kind of crap is just spread by snobs
who want to prove their superior taste in music.
The whole "get smarter by listening to Mozart" theory is just pathetic.
People don't seem to realize that music is something you listen to because you like listening to it.
You can judge someones ability to play an instrument,
but not someones talent when it comes to composing.
How talented a composer is depends on nothing but who is listening to his music.
If you say Tupac is a way more talented composer then Mozart,
there is nothing making your opinion less valid then mine.

People who think they can scientifically prove how musically talented someones is,
is only analysing the music using their own standars of what music is supposed to be.