Cruel and Bitter Place?

[theundeadhero]

What species has ever become extinct because they've become overpopulated and run out of food?

You tell me what killed the dinosaurs. I don't know if it was starvation or not but the point is noone does. Maybe it happened to them. You can't prove it wasn't.

[Anaisa]

Actually i can prove it wasn't. And no no one does know exactly what killed the dinosaurs but they certainly know it wasn't starvation. Even if one species of carnivorous dinosaur become over populated that one species could not have possibly become that over populated that it could wipe out all species of herbivores all other carnivores and all mammels. If that were the case we wouldn't have any mammels now nor would we have crocodiles or alligators. And take all the flying dinosaurs and the dinosaurs that lived in the water they all died out as well and since dinosaurs like the pterodactyl ate fish an over population of a carnivorous dinosaur on land would not have wiped out its species. Nor would it have wiped out a dinosaur that lived in the water because again that animal still had a food source. And there are fossils of dinosaurs that had died inside the egg if the dinosaurs were wiped out by over population this would not have killed unborn dinosaurs either. So no there is no way whatsoever that dinosaurs were wiped out due to an over population of a species.

[nik0tine]

Well, how about "You're a bad person for supporting terrorism"?

No, that's DMKA you're talking about.

Animals do not need there populations controlled by humans they are not going to starve because they've out multiplied their food source.What species has ever become extinct because they've become overpopulated and run out of food? But as we all know there are species that have become extinct due to humans cruelty and interference.

Hey, if you have no idea what you are talking about, than I personally, wouldn't say anything, because you look unintelligent. Animals DO out multiply thier food source, but no animals go exctinct because of it. Let's look at things logically, shall we? There is one rabbit, and two Tigers. One Tiger catches the rabbit and eats it. He doesn't "share" with the other tiger, so the other tiger then starves to death because he can't find any food. make sense? Just for the record, I don't condone hunting for sport, but if you're eating the animal than go for it.


And Republicans err... i mean hunters, definetly SHOULD NOT be killed just because they enjoy something that I find to be immoral.

[Silmaril]

I love tigers. Its sad that they're on the brink of extinction.

[Anaisa]

Hey, if you have no idea what your talking about , then i personally , wouldn't say anything, because you look unintelligent. Animals DO out multiply thier food source, but no animals go exctinct because of it. Let's look at things logically , shall we? There is one rabbit, and two Tigers. One tiger catches the rabbit and eats it. He doesn't "share" with the other tiger, so the other tiger then starves to death because he can't find any food. make sense?

I know exactly what im talking about, but you obviously don't, thats clear by your tiger and rabbit story. Your tiger and rabbit story is not logical. Why would a tiger need to rely on another tiger sharing its food with it?!, it wouldn't, it would have no problem finding food for itself. So no, your story doesn't make sense. I should really tell you to take your own advice because i certainly don't need to. But i didn't mind you sharing your ridiculous story, lacking in any intelligence whatsoever, because i got some great laughs out of it. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: