It's all right here:
Observed adaptation: It is hopefully common knowledge that bacteria have been constantly adapting to survive the antibiotic assaults of mankind. It is hopefully also common knowledge that successive generations of cockroach can become resistant to chemical pesticides, as can numerous other forms of insect. A more specific example is the British peppered moth. Before the nineteenth century it had only been seen in a gray variant, but in 1850 a black mutant variant was seen. The black variant was not successful because it was so easily spotted by predators, compared to its gray brethren which could blend into the tree bark. However, the black variant remained in the species as a recurrent strain due to a recessive gene, and it began to dominate after the Industrial Revolution. There is some debate as to why and how the Industrial Revolution caused this change, but no one can dispute that they were predominantly gray before the Industrial Revolution and predominantly black afterwards, thus acting as an example of environmentally driven change, ie- evolution.
That's what Unne's site says.
That's the difference between evolution and evolution.
Creatures can adapt and change, but they can't transform. The moths may change color, people may change color, and intellignet breeding can make a species change to adapt in it's environment.
But the moths and cochroaches will always be moths and cochroaches. There is a theory of evolution, aside from the dfinition of evolution, which claims that "evolution" will cause more than adaptation. It will cause mutation and transformation with drastic results.
And ya know what? Maybe all humans could eventually be force bred/evolved into 2 ft tall midgets or 10 ft. giants. In the end, we'll be hmans.
Scientists have proved this.
But the debate isn't about evolution. Everybody knows that evolution happens. It's about the evolutionary theory that combats such theories as intellignet design.
And if there are not 2 evolutions, if nobody claims that this is true, then evolution has no place in this discussion. I doubt any evolutionist will admit that evolution has nothing to do with the creation of the many species of the world.
