Because if the laws of physics could be broken at all, they wouldn't be laws of physics, because laws of physics can't be broken. Or to put it more clearly, laws of physics do not have exceptions. If an exception is found, then the law was incorrect in the first place. Of course, evolution is biology, and biology is full of exceptions.Originally Posted by TasteyPies
Evolution is the only theory I have ever heard of which has evidence supporting it, and there's a pretty good amount of it. Creatures in the fossil record get simpler the further back we look. Similar creatures share many of the same genetic markers. And we've seen microevolution occur throughout a number of species; for example, dogs. We have a very large variety of domesticated breeds around. And yet, when we started there were just wolves.
Is evolution full of holes? Yeah. There are probably parts about it that are even wrong. But it is the best educated guess we have. Our civilization's practically built on educated guesses. Newtonian physics, for example. A very good educated guess. But eventually, a lot of it was proven wrong, since it stopped working when you dealt with the extremely small and the extremely large. But by studying Newtonian physics, we found out what was wrong and were lead to a better theory. Copernicus' model of the solar system was wrong. But thanks to astronomers studing it for a century or so, Kepler was able to make a much more accurate model. By following the leads our best guesses provide, we come closer to the truth, even if our best guess was incorrect.






