"Possibly a higher dimension version of time, but not our time."

If we are taking this 'higher' time to mean that it doesn't have to have a beginning, and we're assuming that ours does have to, aren't we putting a lot of faith in a proof none of us have actually read? Does the proof even say that our time couldn't act like this in any situation, rather than just as far as the current motions and positionings in our universe go?

"I assumed that if something has a beginning than it has a cause. Cause and effect has never been proven, but it is a stronger theory than any scientific theories we have. (note: my assumption is stronger than cause and effect (because cause and effect implies my assumption, but not the other way around))"

Cause and effect implies there can't be a beginning doesn't it? If we assume it broke down somewhere we don't have to assume anything had a cause.

"We don't know whether he is constantly creating time or not, this only shows that at least one version of time was created."

I may have worded that badly. My point was that if god wasn't acting in our time when he created the universe then why couldn't he have started it from the middle? If he could start it from anywhere why does it starting at a beginning point to a god?

"If they follow the rules of our universe, they cannot exist eternally. Therefore, if they do exist eternally, they can be seen as "supernatural" to us. Furthermore, if that universe was the cause of our universe, they must have enough power to create time, energy and space."

Not exactly create neccessarily. They may have already possessed these dimensions and simply passed them on. Maybe we're actually a mommy and daddy universes baby universe, and we'll grow up to have some eternal dimensions when we hit puberty .

"Hopefully someone else can answer this, (I haven't taken any Quantum courses yet, but I hope to do some as electives) but keep in mind, this idea would still not be an explaination for the beginning as it still requires time and energy."

Yeah, I may look up the theory later on. But the idea of a loop in time always seemed a fairly simple solution to me, this just gave a scientific account. I don't think it was a major theory, just a suggestion.