"That is what we are disagreeing on. We have not observed any evolution which would result in species changes. (I mean like an ape changing into a man) Evolutionists are just hoping that something will appear that shows we did indeed come from apes, there is no proof (and I will continue to argue no evidence) we did."
Okay, well consider a fictional animal. It is red, small, and has a tail. It is described as being a member of species A. Over a long time species A gradually becomes green to camouflage itself. It then gets gradually bigger to... do big things. Climate changes then cause it to form a layer of blubber. It is no longer species A, it is now called species B.
This is very loose, but notice that at no point in the chain does it include the step 'changes from species A to species B'.
"Definition of oscillating universe. The problem with your idea is that if there was any probability of this event happening, (which caused the universe to not re-collapse) it would have already happened."
Only assuming there have been an infinite number of oscillations already... I think...
"You misunderstood my argument. My argument was that scientific principles are built upon induction (what we can see), and these scientific principles disagree with the oscillating universe theory/infinite time. The point was that if infinite time does not exist, then the universe requires the supernatural. As I said before, only some of the laws of Physics must break down at the singularity."
I kinda knew you weren't getting at that, but that is an arguement you seem to be making generally so I used it. You also seem to assume that supernatural means 'not understood by science', which is fine. But you also also seem to assume 'not understood by science' means 'CAN'T be understood by science'.
