Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 48 of 48

Thread: X or X-2?

  1. #46

    Default

    while X-2 does have its cheesy moments (charlies angels anyone?) I believe that X isnt complete without it, playing through the few bad parts is well worth the perfect ending.

  2. #47
    Feel the Bern Administrator Del Murder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Oakland, California
    Posts
    41,740
    Articles
    6
    Blog Entries
    2
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Administrator
    • Hosted the Ciddies

    Default

    I liked X better. X-2 was more like an added bonus than an epic like it's predecessor.

    Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
    When I grow up, I want to go to Bovine Trump University! - Ralph Wiggum

  3. #48

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    newcastle, australia
    Posts
    23

    Default definetely X

    Well, to be honest, X is a much better game. i think that the elements that make X-2 an enjoyable game would have been used in a new game in the series, not a rehash of what was a perfect story in X.
    In the game, yuna speaks of the dishgonour done to zanarkand by having tourists there. i think, tho enjoyable, X-2 is sort of like that. X was amazing on its own... i try to look at X-2 as a stand alone game, not a sequal, so as to keep the beauty of X untarnished.
    having said that, after ten nearly flawless games... i guess we can foprgive square for a single, momentary lapse in concentration...?
    DIE AND BE FREE OF PAIN, OR LIVE AND FIGHT YOUR SORROW
    I'll be waiting, so if you come here, you'll find me. I PROMISE.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •