Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: What is your music compression rate?

  1. #16
    tech spirit
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Virgo supercluster
    Posts
    17,950
    Articles
    2
    Blog Entries
    2

    FFXIV Character

    Mirage Askai (Sargatanas)

    Default

    Not that bitrate is everything anyway. A good MP3 encoder can produce a better result at 128 kbps than a <img src=http://forums.eyesonff.com/images/smilies/rpg_009.gif><img src=http://forums.eyesonff.com/images/smilies/rpg_009.gif><img src=http://forums.eyesonff.com/images/smilies/rpg_009.gif><img src=http://forums.eyesonff.com/images/smilies/rpg_009.gif>ty encoder can do at 160, for example.
    everything is wrapped in gray
    i'm focusing on your image
    can you hear me in the void?

  2. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lindy
    So, basically, the iPod rips everything out of a track that takes up space.

    And you complain about not being able to fill up all the space, christ, you have, what, 30 gigabytes?

    At least encode it at a decent rate!

    192vbr, though I have a lot of old stuff that's just plain 192 or 128, and the difference between 192 and 128 is VERY noticeable for me, I even re-ripped a bunch of albums at 192 to replace the 128 versions I had, and it's much better.
    I never complained that I couldn't fill up the space, I just said that I need more music to fill it up. I plan to keep my iPod for a very long time, and since I collect CDs every other week, it'll bound to expand. So by that, I try to keep file sizes low.

    I have a 15GB iPod, my laptop will probably have at most 30GBs. I might buy an external HD to store all my music and such later on. But I'm very limited on money right now. So I have to keep bitrates low, otherwise I'll end up needing to buy a new HD.

  3. #18
    ..a Russian mountain cat. Yamaneko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    15,927
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    900+ VBR. Or lower quality OGGs. Or CDA.

  4. #19
    #eoff Flayer Mindflare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    719

    Default

    I rip CDs at 256 kbps .mp3, but most of my collection is at 128 kbps. Works well enough for all I do.
    --It's me!--

  5. #20
    Banned MecaKane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,002

    Default

    My speakers are crap, but I can still hear the difference in 96 and 128. Nothing else over that, though. Most of what I get download is 128, or 192, because I just know it's better. >_>

  6. #21
    tech spirit
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Virgo supercluster
    Posts
    17,950
    Articles
    2
    Blog Entries
    2

    FFXIV Character

    Mirage Askai (Sargatanas)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yamaneko
    900+ VBR. :D Or lower quality OGGs. Or CDA.
    Just use a lossless format like FLAC? They average at 700 kbps I hear, and are 100% lossless.
    everything is wrapped in gray
    i'm focusing on your image
    can you hear me in the void?

  7. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mirage
    Just use a lossless format like FLAC? They average at 700 kbps I hear, and are 100% lossless.
    Apple's Lossless format is half the size of the original and supposedly are 100% lossless. I've tested it myself and can't find the difference, but I don't have a sound monitor to know for sure. Sound monitors cost thousands anyways, but eh.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •