Originally Posted by Raistlin
Well, then, here's my threat: If BoB has to step down, I'll step up to replace him. And then I'll go on a rampage.
BoB has to take his job back when it's all over, though.
Yes
No
Well, then, here's my threat: If BoB has to step down, I'll step up to replace him. And then I'll go on a rampage.
BoB has to take his job back when it's all over, though.
I vote "no" to spite Bleys, since he won't turn traitor and join what's obviously a superior party. Sorry, Gravesy.
Actually, I think Bleys is actually enjoying himself as a commie. He's getting in touch with his liberal side. I mean, he got a <i>kitten</i> for Christ's sake, and called it <i>cute</i>. Obvious evidence of senility.
Obvious cover-up for having another litter box.
It appears what this forum needs is a hero.
Super Delete appears to be on holiday so BoB called me in instead.
That's a better answer ^.^
I say yes. I don't see the harm in it.
once again we solve a dilemma without resorting to violence. :<3:
BoB is certified to be leader of the #eoff party. I expect great things.
Everyone will lose to Unne in the end.
I voted yes, why, because in the real world, High Powered officials run for positions, and in this, ALL can run. Also, it provides me with muck more on my media coverage of the election.
So yes, let him run with the wind!
I send my genuine thanks to everyone who supported me in this poll. Every vote counted, and I'm grateful - regardless of your party - for encouraging equal rights to the ability to run for leadership in the EoFF General Elections. Woohoo!
Bow before the mighty Javoo!
In my opinion, rules should apply for everyone, without exceptions. Making exceptions and exclutions is only one step further to elitism, and I am in no way a supporter of that. I think EoFF has gotten better regarding elitism, so why ruin it now?
I say get rid of the rule, or keep it and let it apply for everyone. What's the point of having rules if they're not going to be followed? That's a bad example for the rest of the community. You're wondering why there are people breaking the "laws" of eoff? Well, here's your answer.
So I'll vote no. Don't take it personally BoB, it's absolutely not meant that way, and I do want you to participate, so if there was a poll asking to remove the rule, I'd vote yes. You're a good friend, it's just that I have strong opinions.
Don't worry, Hardwood Hank (I love that name), no offence taken and I agree with you anyway.
Bow before the mighty Javoo!
Thanks, I love the name too
Posting Permissions
