Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: FAA Had 52 Warnings

  1. #1
    Recognized Member TheAbominatrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sacramento, California
    Posts
    6,838
    Contributions
    • Hosted Eyes on You

    Default FAA Had 52 Warnings


  2. #2
    dizzy up the girl Recognized Member Rye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    a tiny boot
    Posts
    24,891
    Articles
    4
    Blog Entries
    3
    Contributions
    • Hosted Eyes on You
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    I was just reading about that before I saw this. It's not surprising, really.


  3. #3
    Recognized Member TheAbominatrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sacramento, California
    Posts
    6,838
    Contributions
    • Hosted Eyes on You

    Default

    Yeah I wasnt very shocked.

  4. #4
    Banned lordblazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    oklahoma city,OK
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Nothing new I'm surprised no one has talked about North Korea officially declaring they have made nukes and will not disarm them.

  5. #5
    Banned Destai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ireland (In other words a B-I-G field)
    Posts
    5,146

    Default

    Whats the FAA?

  6. #6
    Banned lordblazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    oklahoma city,OK
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    the Federal Aviation Administration.They are in cahrge of all air traffic in the good ole USA.HQ is in oklahoma or i do know they have a big place in oklahoma in which i have been to.

  7. #7
    Recognized Member TheAbominatrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sacramento, California
    Posts
    6,838
    Contributions
    • Hosted Eyes on You

    Default

    Federal Airline Administration or something to that effect. edit - What lordblazer said.

    And I'm less surprised about the nukes than this.

  8. #8
    Proudly Loathsome ;) DMKA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,306

    FFXIV Character

    Efes Ephesus (Adamantoise)

    Default

    Wait...we're still talking about this? I thought the elections were already over.

    Yeah, it's not suprising...nor is it suprising that this isn't mentioned until we've bombed the hell out of 2 countries and Bush has won his second term.
    I like Kung-Fu.

  9. #9
    Banned nik0tine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dalmasca!
    Posts
    12,133

    Default

    This doesn't surprise me at all. I personally believe that 9/11 was allowed to happen. Im not going to get into it right now, but this just reinforces my opinion about that.

  10. #10
    Banned Destai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ireland (In other words a B-I-G field)
    Posts
    5,146

    Default

    Well Bush was handed a document during his cowboy fantasy in Texas entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Attack America" or something as plainly titled as that.

  11. #11
    Blademaster of Northland DeBlayde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    well, it ain't coldest Hel no more. :D
    Posts
    857

    Default

    they were expecting bombs and ransom demands. Al-Quida (probably spelled that wrong) is really good at thinking outside the box. One has great difficulty defending oneself against an attack that one is wholly unaware of the possibility for.

    when those planes were hijacked, everybody onboard probably thought they would be ordered to land someplace and then demands would be made. Only the one that went down in pensylvania had anybody on board who accurately read the intentions of the hijackers.

    the one tape where Bin Laden was talking to the Sheik guy and commenting about the effectiveness of the attack and how he was expecting only the floors above the strike to colapse based on previous events, remember that one? justification for the Afganistan invasion? well, I don't remember hearing anywhere of anybody flying planes into skyscrapers before.

    It's kinda like when somebody's repeatedly punching you, and in all the fights you've ever had before with people just like this person, all they've ever done is punch when alluva sudden a kick comes outta nowhere. all your defensive strategies are based around punches. you've got nothing against kicks.

    Makoto, Honesty.

  12. #12
    Recognized Member TheAbominatrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sacramento, California
    Posts
    6,838
    Contributions
    • Hosted Eyes on You

    Default

    However, the FAA has the warnings, and these are the important things about the articles.

    "Aviation officials were ``lulled into a false sense of security'' and ``intelligence that indicated a real and growing threat leading up to 9/ll did not stimulate significant increases in security procedures.'' "

    "It notes that the FAA did not expand the use of in-flight air marshals or tighten airport screening for weapons. It said FAA officials were more concerned with reducing airline congestion, lessening delays and easing air carriers' financial problems than thwarting a terrorist attack. "

    That is the problem. If you cant predict your enemy's attacks, then you do your best to cover your ass. No one tried to cover their asses in this. These planes should not have been hijacked, and perhaps would not have if warnings were heeded and security was tightened.

  13. #13
    Misspelled for No Reason. GhandiOwnsYou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Pyeongtaek, sKorea
    Posts
    1,235

    Default

    yeah, i saw that. you have any idea how many of these things are going around at any given time? If we freaked out everytime we got word someone was going to attack something in america using a plane, the FAA would be doing full body cavity searches and sending people on flights naked. you have to balance out how LIKELY they thought it was that this was gonna actually happen, compared to the costs and infringment on passengers freedoms that would be made to try and bump security. You can't react to EVERY warning, or even systems of warnings like these here, they'd be to frequent and america would be even more paranoid than the nutjobs we are now. bad times that this one squeaked throuhg, but i can't blame to FAA for this type of thing.

  14. #14
    Recognized Member TheAbominatrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sacramento, California
    Posts
    6,838
    Contributions
    • Hosted Eyes on You

    Default

    With the amount and severity of these warnings, the FAA had no excuse to ignore them. They took no precautions what-so-ever. I could understand them not jumping at every one, but after 52 of them, they should have taken steps to try and prevent something from happening. Maybe it still would have happened, but at least they would have tried.

  15. #15
    Banned lordblazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    oklahoma city,OK
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Yeah the FAA has no excuse for this.They killed all these people basicly by not taking Bin laden seriously. Bin Laden being the person with USA CIA training.Yeah I would've tighten air security.I wouldn't have minded having a cavity check if it mean t i got to live.I mean those poeple on the airplane who died during 9/11 wouldn;t have minded.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •