"But if I AM just an animal, then my eating other animals is perfectly fine. And don't go into that "we know better" crap. Animals CAN'T know better, it's not in their nature."

For christ's sake, OTHER animals don't know better, but we do, because we're more intelligent. How is this hard to grasp? Animals differ in many ways. Cheetehs are fast runner, squirrels can climb, fish can swim, and humans are smart. It doesn't make any of them not animals just because they possess a trait or act in a different way than other animals.

And I already said that animals do have some morality. Are you just not reading my posts at all now?

"So it's safe to assume you eat one meal a day? And don't live in a house in the city, or drive a car? Or do anything else that isn't a compelte necessity for survival?"

Within reason. Expecting me to live in a hole is not reasonable. Hence why the saying is limiting the suffering and not no suffering whatsoever.

I will say this though, that is probably the best counter argument so far. Good job.