Page 3 of 15 FirstFirst 12345678913 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 217

Thread: "Abusing" the swear filter

  1. #31
    Quack Shlup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    34,993
    Articles
    14
    Blog Entries
    37
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    1) Because its annoying. I usually don't change it if the swear was used in an okay context though. And what BoB said.

    2) Yes. They don't just check once and then stop caring. Spiders, you know.

    And you so did not just say "draconian enforcement." xD

  2. #32
    Posts Occur in Real Time edczxcvbnm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    7,920

    Default

    I wouldn't say that I don't care. I would say that I am uncomfortably content. But after waging this war for what? 3 or so years, this is probably about the best comprimise I can hope for. After 3 years I just go "At least I got them to stop editting edits."

  3. #33
    Quack Shlup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    34,993
    Articles
    14
    Blog Entries
    37
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Well a person can only hear so many "bleeps" before they change the channel. Your swearing doesn't bother me though, ed. I usually tune you out anyway.

  4. #34
    Shlup's Retired Pimp Recognized Member Raistlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Spying on Unne and BUO
    Posts
    20,583
    Articles
    101
    Blog Entries
    45
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor

    Default

    1) Because its annoying. I usually don't change it if the swear was used in an okay context though. And what BoB said.
    Personal preferences != good rules. Post counts were taken away, not because people were complaining about post counts, or found them irritating or annoying or whatever, but because it had the direct result of limiting spam. It was better for the board.

    2) Yes. They don't just check once and then stop caring. Spiders, you know.
    Huh?

    EDIT: Nevermind; I just had to look back at my question to understand your answer. But anyway, then the swear filter itself is fine.

    And you so did not just say "draconian enforcement." xD
    You're damn right I did. You got a problem with it? >=o

  5. #35
    Posts Occur in Real Time edczxcvbnm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    7,920

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShlupQuack
    Well a person can only hear so many "bleeps" before they change the channel. Your swearing doesn't bother me though, ed. I usually tune you out anyway.
    I thought I had been doing a fairly good job of keeping it down...until I decided to for that election party with heartshot. Then I felt the need to swear more just for the sake of the party and stuff. It takes time to go back. Habits die hard

  6. #36
    Quack Shlup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    34,993
    Articles
    14
    Blog Entries
    37
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raistlin
    Personal preferences != good rules. Post counts were taken away, not because people were complaining about post counts, or found them irritating or annoying or whatever, but because it had the direct result of limiting spam. It was better for the board.
    I don't understand what one has to do with the other. You saying that us trying to do things to discourage swearing in the same way we removed post counts in order to discourage spamming is good or bad?
    Quote Originally Posted by Raistlin
    You're damn right I did. You got a problem with it? >=o
    Depends on what you mean by it. To someone who doesn't no any better, that would likely imply the use of rules without question or reason. But, knowing draconians, I would say that it'd more accurately implicate that we're all enforcing what's best for us, as a draconian, in the end, only follows what suits him best. Or something. I hear the draconian race seems a bit more complicated if you read Draconian Measures, but haven't.

    Besides the fact that you're a giant nerd. NERD!
    Quote Originally Posted by edczxcvbnm
    I thought I had been doing a fairly good job of keeping it down...until I decided to for that election party with heartshot. Then I felt the need to swear more just for the sake of the party and stuff. It takes time to go back. Habits die hard
    I honestly don't notice it anyway. Its not me that the swearing bothers, unless someone's going around the swear filter for no reason other than they want to swear. Most of the time when I see someone going around the swear filter it doesn't bother me personally though. *shrug*

  7. #37
    Newbie Administrator Loony BoB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    52,471
    Articles
    53
    Blog Entries
    19

    FFXIV Character

    Loony Bob (Twintania)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raistlin
    Personal preferences != good rules.
    You're damned right! Which is why your personal preference of having more swear words removed is being declined.
    Bow before the mighty Javoo!

  8. #38
    Shlup's Retired Pimp Recognized Member Raistlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Spying on Unne and BUO
    Posts
    20,583
    Articles
    101
    Blog Entries
    45
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor

    Default

    You're damned right! Which is why your personal preference of having more swear words removed is being declined.
    No, my personal preference is that the swear filter be removed entirely. However, thinking of Cid and the members and the general outlook of the board, I would agree that the best course of action would be the keep the swear filter, but not have the enforcement be by one moderator taking things to extremes. The mere fact that only one staffer does it shows that most of the members don't give a damn.

    I don't understand what one has to do with the other. You saying that us trying to do things to discourage swearing in the same way we removed post counts in order to discourage spamming is good or bad?
    I'm saying that in the first case(removal of post counts), the staff took the good of the board over any personal preferences. It was obvious that removing the post counts would directly help the board by not having any encouragement for spam. No subjectiveness, no personal opinions: just fact.
    The unreasonable extreme of editting and warning people who try to "get around the filter" has nothing to do with objectivity or facts. It's sheer personal preference of one specific staff member.

    Depends on what you mean by it. To someone who doesn't no any better, that would likely imply the use of rules without question or reason. But, knowing draconians, I would say that it'd more accurately implicate that we're all enforcing what's best for us, as a draconian, in the end, only follows what suits him best. Or something. I hear the draconian race seems a bit more complicated if you read Draconian Measures, but haven't.

    Besides the fact that you're a giant nerd. NERD!
    Wait...I'm the nerd for using a legitimate English word...and you're not a nerd for taking that aforementioned word out of context and using it in the context of a fantasy book series?

  9. #39
    Quack Shlup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    34,993
    Articles
    14
    Blog Entries
    37
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Its a real word? o.O Is not!

    And there is no "one specific staff member taking things to extremes." When was the last time this "one staff member" did anything you're accusing her of? Was it before the last time this was brought up? 'Cause I'm pretty sure it was. The issue has already been addressed, taken care of, laid to rest. If the whole point of this thread was just to say "stop dong that thing" then there's no reason for it 'cause she already did, although I think its sad that's she's had to come under such scrutiny for something that shouldn't be a big deal, and feels less comfortable here because some people value their swear words.

  10. #40
    ORANGE Dr Unne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    7,394
    Articles
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Developer
    • Former Tech Admin

    Default

    Raist, you've convinced me to start editing people's profanities again. Apparently I don't exist otherwise, since only one specific person in the whole world cares about people swearing.

  11. #41
    Shlup's Retired Pimp Recognized Member Raistlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Spying on Unne and BUO
    Posts
    20,583
    Articles
    101
    Blog Entries
    45
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor

    Default

    And there is no "one specific staff member taking things to extremes." When was the last time this "one staff member" did anything you're accusing her of? Was it before the last time this was brought up? 'Cause I'm pretty sure it was. The issue has already been addressed, taken care of, laid to rest. If the whole point of this thread was just to say "stop dong that thing" then there's no reason for it 'cause she already did
    ...That's not what Kishi told me! >=o

    He just told me the Staff discussion had fizzled out, or something("no decisions had been made").

    Raist, you've convinced me to start editing people's profanities again. Apparently I don't exist otherwise, since only one specific person in the whole world cares about people swearing.
    There's a distinct difference between editting profanities of someone cussing-out someone/thing and someone just saying on swear word in the middle of a thoughtful post.

    Oh, and go to *arf*.

  12. #42
    Recognized Member m4tt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    San Diego, Ca
    Posts
    5,134
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    I edit out swear words in the FF forums all the time. I even edit out things like "i think tidus is GAY cuz he looks GAY OMG GAY!" because it's offensive and immature. So it's not just one mod doing it.
    Mr Thou! Mr Thou!

  13. #43
    Quack Shlup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    34,993
    Articles
    14
    Blog Entries
    37
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    That's what you get for listening to Kishi!

  14. #44
    Newbie Administrator Loony BoB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    52,471
    Articles
    53
    Blog Entries
    19

    FFXIV Character

    Loony Bob (Twintania)

    Default

    *raises hand* I comment out filthy language from time to time. Just not as often, but then Leeza checks reported posts far, far more often than I do, too. That doesn't mean they shouldn't be checked. What Leeza, Matt and I do is done not out of personal preference but with the backing of staff.

    No, my personal preference is that the swear filter be removed entirely. However, thinking of Cid and the members and the general outlook of the board, I would agree that the best course of action would be the keep the swear filter, but not have the enforcement be by one moderator taking things to extremes. The mere fact that only one staffer does it shows that most of the members don't give a damn.
    We're LAZY. That's all. But it still seems like you're voicing your personal preferences. We have rules in place that are based on discussions we have in staff and anything you see done is done in accordance to our rules. It seems to be your personal preference that we stop editing out such words.

    Also, how would this change that you are suggesting be good for the boards? As far as I know it would only serve to be a discomfort to certain members. Are you discomforted somehow? Is there any other reason you want this rule changed? If not, you haven't got any better argument than they do, that's for sure.
    Bow before the mighty Javoo!

  15. #45
    Banished Ace Recognized Member Agent Proto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Root Beer Forum
    Posts
    15,629
    Articles
    111
    Blog Entries
    70
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Ok, so it's a staff-backed up thing. Alright. I can agree with that.

    Apparently, I have been declared banished.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •