Even edc and Bleys seem to be fine with the current state of EoFF, since their problem has already been looked into within staff before this thread was even made.
Not according to what he's *beep* elsewhere.

I'm mostly just annoyed because I think an issue is being made about nothing. Nothing. What do you want, Raist? You want us to un-censor ? You want there to be no limit to how much a person can swear, as long as its censored, like on Jerry Springer or something?
I have no problem with the current swear filter for the current reason(Google). My question remains:

1. Why do staff members(one, anyway) edit peoples' *arf* where they try to "get around" the swear filter, even though the addition of all but the *honk* to the swear filter was solely because of Google, and not because of *trumpets*? Cid even made it clear he didn't like the *train goes by*.

2. Is the swear filter still necessary to keep the *explosions and whatnot*?

My personal preference(barring any offers for money from Google, as I stated in my original post), is that of the original EoFF: swearing allowed, but not in excess. However, I fully agree with Cid's right to add words to the filter to get extra *cow stampede*. I don't support, however, *Beethoven's Pastoral Symphony* of that filter when it wasn't even added in the first place because people were *Raist complaining incessantly.... oh wait*.