Quote Originally Posted by Psychotic
Well, theoretically everyone should be banned when porn is posted, whether it was accidental or not. This is due to the precedent of the Peter situation. However, I firmly believe that had someone more popular/well-known/whatever you want to call it than Peter had posted that originally, the outcome in that situation (pre-precedent) would have been different, and so do many others, hence the "annoying sigs" as you have indirectly referred to them as. You fit that description, in my personal opinion, hence why you would have been used in an example for such a situation, until you had expressed your concerns about being used in such a way.
Why don't you just use yourself as an example? As you posted something that was as inappropriate as a 60x60 .gif or a body part made of snow, and nothing was done about it. Or how 'bout Bert? Oh but you guys aren't exactly 'staff pets' so it'd just poke one giant hole in your theory.

Although I do agree that there shouldn't really be a case-by-case with porn, the cases aren't as stacked aganist you as you'd like to tell people.