-
Banned
Affirmative Action doesn't mean taking the minority out of two equally qualified candidates, it means quotas. "You must have this many percent of your workforce be this certain minority or we'll sue." (Particularly the NAACP.) Even so, out of two "equally qualified" (no two people are perfectly equally qualified) candidates, what says the minority should get the job? Affirmative Action forces employers to take less qualified candidates based solely on their skin color.
Who's more likely to get into college based on race/sex? Not white males.
Who's more likely to not only get into college, but get much more money and opportunities for college, based on race/sex? Not white males.
Who's more likely to get a job in most places, based on race/sex? Not white males.
And who's the most likely to sue based on allegations of racism or sexism? Not white males.
There hasn't been a black or female president yet because nobody black or female has been worth voting for. If you'll remember correctly, we have had people on the ballot that weren't white males. And I believe that Hillary will run for the Dems in '08, which would probably mean that the Reps would have to put up Condi Rice. White woman president, or black woman president.
And the reason white men are the CEOs and richest people in this country is that, for one thing, equal rights is something that's only been accomplished in the last decade or so, and for another, those white men did what they needed to do so that they deserved to make the money, or run the company.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules