From a personal stand point, i belive it would be more acceptable to take out the tube. Why? Because the recources that keep her alive (not to mention all the money) could go to better use. And what i mean about better use is the use on other patiants that have a better chance at survival. She has been in acoma for 15 years. I could see where the problem would be if it was 1 or 2 years. But this is 15. I highly doubt that she will live a full life. She may continue to live, but wouldnt it be better to die then to live another 15-30 years in a vegitative state with a small chance of recovery.
But the part i do not agree about, is that it would take her 2 weeks to die after they take out the tube. Thats is just wrong. Even if she is in acoma, she is subconcously alive and may feel the pain of hunger in dreams. If they remove the tube, i think she should remove all equipment aswell.
