I would hope that if you're qualified enough to be offered a position of staff here at EoFF, you have enough restraint on the insigificant suggestions. It's not that hard not to call an idea "stupid" or not to publicly cuss out members.It doesn't help when the suggestions are really bad. Regular users and staff need to take this forum a little more seriously, anyway.
Exactly. Staffing is a responsibility, not a privilige. You were offered the position for the benefit of the forum - not as a reward.But then, weren't we offered this job so that we could contribute to the ongoing success of the forum? We all chose to become moderators (except RSL who is chained for life), so I'd say we're morally obliged to do a decent job.
Do the actions of one part of staff reflect on the whole? Absolutely.A good point. But then, in many cases there are staffers with different approaches to things. If a handful of staff members are horsing around, does it make the whole team look bad?
Well, depends on the action.Does it drag an entire forum into a deeper low?
But I would imagine it could.
Exactly. And that balance is not cussing out or patronizing members in Feedback. I don't think that fits anyone's idea of "fun" except maybe Bleys's.When staff choose to be staff, they give up their rights to have "fun", and by that I mean breaking the rules and acting in a silly manner as they have to enforce said rules and generally set a good example.
On the other hand, this would lead to many people not wanting to be staff: What's the point in posting on a message board if it isn't fun?
I guess there just has to be a balance between the two.






