no but III is exactly the same game
Not really. Unless you're talking about the U.S version, which is called FF3.Originally Posted by biff0465
FF6 in Japan is FF3 here. They really screwed up the number system.
Better question. Do you know who Kefka is?
as a matter of fact, I do.Originally Posted by Behold the Void
Kefka
Level- 71
HP- 62000
MP- 38000
Atk- 80
Def- 117
Attacks- Normal, Havoc Wing, Revenger, Hyper Drive, Goner, Train, Fallen One, Fire Ice and Thunder 3, and Ultima.
Safer Sephiroth
Level- ?
HP- 150000
MP- 8500
Atk- ?
Def- ?
Attacks- Havoc Wing, Pale Horse, Deen, DeBarrier, DeSpell, Demi3, Break, Wall, Shadow Flare, Super Nova
Last edited by strawberryman; 03-22-2005 at 03:52 AM.
Thanks to Sagensyg for the sig!
In greater detail, possibly. :rolleyes2Originally Posted by biff0465
Thanks to Sagensyg for the sig!
i haven't played it in awhile, i like kefka as well as FFIII but i've just always thought Sephiroth was really cool (i love swords)
Just checking. Don't need people who have'nt played one or the other giving a baised opinion. I never really did finish 7, though. got right around the end and lost interest.Originally Posted by biff0465
Thanks to Sagensyg for the sig!
well if you haven't beaten VII i wouldn't call myself a ff fan
Please don't say that. I don't want to get started into the who's/who's not an FF fan. This thread is about Kefka vs. Sephiroth.Originally Posted by biff0465
Thanks to Sagensyg for the sig!
didn't mean to let it come out like that didn't want to piss anyone off i'm sure you love ff as much as me ur jus interested in different things
Thank you.Originally Posted by biff0465
![]()
Thanks to Sagensyg for the sig!
I'd hardly call FFVII the test of a "True FF Fan" since FFVII and VIII were extremely deviant from what most Final Fantasies are.
Anyways,
With the hard stats, Safer Sephiroth does come out on top, but that's assuming that Fallen One doesn't work, and also how they are being controlled. If it were both in control of A"I" then it'd be up in the air most of the times. The Super Nova/Fallen One is the big issue, IF they work more often than not Kefka'll come out on top. If they do not work, then Safer Sephiroth probably'd win most of the time. Although come to think of it, I don't believe Safer Sephiroth can do a whole lot of damage with his attacks, as I recall correctly he was never getting over 3,000. I don't recall the damage that Kefka was dishing out, I'll have to beat VI again before I can do that, so I still can't say with absolute certainty who does have the edge in this fight.
Were they really? Then, were IX and X deviant as well? I can't say, I've only play VII and up, but I'd love to get my hands on a copy of VI. I've started becoming interested in the older FFs because of this forum....but why exactly do VII and VIII differ from the older FFs, then?Originally Posted by Behold the Void
And, on topic....obviously I haven't played VI yet, but I've read the forum, and I get the general gist of where the competition really lies. I agree that if Kefka's Fallen One move works, then Sephiroth is dead--no hope. However, since bosses tend to be immune to these things, Sephiroth might not be affected, except that he was affected by Cait Sith's Game Over, and....um....
This thread is going to go around in many, many, many circles, you know.![]()
Last edited by FallenAngel411; 03-23-2005 at 04:40 AM.
THE MEW HATH NO NEED OF A SIG >:3
That's exactly why I made the thread. To see where It would get.Originally Posted by FallenAngel411
These are considered the 'Greatest' among the FF villians.
EDIT-
I also notice they both have havoc wing.
Thanks to Sagensyg for the sig!
But the nature of "hard stats" doesn't cross genres. Don't forget, FF7 had considerably higher damage being thrown about. They gave out 9999 damage attacks like candy by the third disk. The gaming equivilant to inflation.
Also, FA, you should be able to find emulation and roms for all the classic FF games, right here on this site. Personally, I advise you try out FF1, FF5 and FF6... the others really don't have much to offer that you can't find (better) in those three.