It is my opinion that what they abort isn't any more of a baby than a sperm or an egg.
Something I don't understand about your view though, a lot of people support abortion only if the mother was raped, or if the pregnancy posed a threat to the mother's health. I don't get that. So, according to that logic, murdering a child is ok sometimes? I mean, if a women was raped and had a child, say the child's 1 now, and she wants it gone. According to the above logic, that would be ok, right? Since there's no difference between a zygote and a baby.
I think that view just shows that even those people know intuitively that there IS a difference between a child an a zygote.
