"Who would be responsible for the creation of this new constitution? If every member were to have their say then we'd end up with a constitution full of unecessary, senseless rubbish. If the job were left to a select few then it's unlikely anything would change at all, and the document would not be taken seriously by the majority of members."
If the idea does have any backing, perhaps make up a committee of members, both on Staff and off Staff who are well respected and have the support of the board. That way, in effect, the voices of the majority and those who might want to make changes can be heard within reason.
Take care all, and thanks for the feedback thus far.
