Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 53

Thread: Is this a joke?/Sony PS2 Controllers are Illegal!

  1. #31
    Talim Lover! BatChao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Torrance, CA
    Posts
    686

    Default

    I actually think Immersion just owns the patent to one kind of force feedback motor. I believe it's the kind with two motors side by side and probably other various features. These are the motors used by Sony and Microsoft. Nintendo has their own rumble feature (probably developed when they created the Rumble Pak for N64), so they are exempt from this lawsuit.

    Also, if I remember correctly, MS and Sony were sued at the same time, but MS opted to settle out of court. They paid the company like $20 million or something and bought some of their stock or something like that. Sony opted to go to court and this is the result.
    "It's an adult kiss...we'll do the rest when you get back." -Misato Katsuragi

    [size=1]Soul Calibur r0x0rz my b0x0rz!
    Actually... I don't wear boxers, but Soul Calibur r0x0rz my briefz0rz just doesn't have the same ring to it...

    **Proud owner of the Mercedes Scar**

  2. #32
    Banned MecaKane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,002

    Default

    "Oh, oh. I own controlers and those games what'm I gonna dooooooo?"

    Nothing! God. What do you think Sony is paying for? They're compensating Immersion for you buying their [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img], no one's going to take anything from you. They can't fault any customers for buying something that Sony shouldn't have been selling.

  3. #33
    Navydav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Posts
    36

    Default

    But if they quit making the Dual Shock controller, does that mean the games that suppport it won't work anymore? And does this have anything to do with using the joystick to move characters, etc around because I love the Analog Function.
    If it isn't broke, don't fix it.

  4. #34
    Prinny God Recognized Member Endless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Prinny Moon
    Posts
    2,641
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    - It's the rumble feature that's at stake
    - Nintendo licensed from them before the suits, I think for the GC, since the N64 used a speperate device you'd plug into the controller
    - MS, settled out of court and in the mean time bought a little part of that company
    - Depite all the headlines, Sony cann still sell PS2s, PSs, controllers and the games listed. During the appeal, the order is suspended.
    - There is still a long way before it will end. Sony said they were ready to go to the Supreme Court if necessary
    - The first patents filed by Immersion were around 1995 if my memory serves me right.

    And then there is Death

  5. #35
    Funkadelic Jammer crazybayman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Currently, Hoth. Yes, Hoth.
    Posts
    2,037

    Default

    yep......no worries here.

    When the "$hit really hits the fan" down the road, Sony will have a solution. Whether its a new controller thats compatible to the previous dual shock games, or a settlement with Immersion, or whatever, we'll all still be able to play our games.

  6. #36

    Default

    Apearantly, Sony was ordered to stop selling the PS2, the controller, and the games that use the rumble feature.
    The reason being, Immersion owns the rights to all forms of rumble feedback... as well as other forms of feedback.
    Sony can't even have the technology in their PS2 that allows for the Rumble feature. @_@
    So, there isn't even a chance that Sony can make their own rumble, because it's still belongs to Immersion. =/
    Even Nintendo had to pay Immersion to add rumble to their controller.

    This means that if Sony wants to keep the rumble feature, they HAVE to pay Immersion for it.

    At least for now, there is the appeal... Donno how far it will go, cause I dont know the details of the case. =/

  7. #37
    Mold Anus Old Manus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    cumree
    Posts
    14,731
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    This may greatly increase the prices of Sony goods.


    there was a picture here

  8. #38
    Perfectly Flawed YukiKiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    719

    Default

    for the love of- they're suing on an offset weight that spins around thus creating a rumble effect. you can put a patent on science? since when? sometimes the world never ceases to amaze me.

    Being wise comes in two parts: 1) having a lot to say and 2) not saying it.

    Thanks to Starry Relm and Sphere for the Sig and Avatar (in their respecive order)

  9. #39
    Talim Lover! BatChao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Torrance, CA
    Posts
    686

    Default

    If I was a small company and had a genuine case and could potentially make millions, I'd sue too...
    "It's an adult kiss...we'll do the rest when you get back." -Misato Katsuragi

    [size=1]Soul Calibur r0x0rz my b0x0rz!
    Actually... I don't wear boxers, but Soul Calibur r0x0rz my briefz0rz just doesn't have the same ring to it...

    **Proud owner of the Mercedes Scar**

  10. #40
    Banned MecaKane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,002

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YukiKiro
    you can put a patent on science? since when?
    Since patents were invented, I'm sure. Drugs, cars, electronics, etc etc etc.

    Sony would sue the [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] out of you if you sold something that used their technology that they developed themselves to play their games. And I think they tried to, with Bleem, only it was found that Bleem's bios was one they developed it themselves or something.

  11. #41
    A Big Deal? Recognized Member Big D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    8,370
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    I think it's a true testament to Microsoft's pathicness (pathetability? pathetitude?) that the only way they can gain an advantage over their competition is by way of lawsuit. Not by being a better company with a better product, but through another typically trivial civil action. Damn US legal system with no 'floodgates' principle...

    Since vibrating controllers have existed since N64 days (admittedly, the Rumble Pack was a slightly different system) there should be some means to counter this lawsuit. I mean, imagine if the makers of Pong decided to copyright the joystick. Practically every console ever (except for the Sega MS/MD and the NES/SNES) would be affected.

    This is like that time Wizards of the Coast (makers of Magic: The Gathering) said they were going to copyright card games. They didn't succeed, did they?

  12. #42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big D
    Practically every console ever (except for the Sega MS/MD and the NES/SNES) would be affected.
    The NES had a joystick-like controller available

  13. #43
    Talim Lover! BatChao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Torrance, CA
    Posts
    686

    Default

    Plus Pong used a wheel... not a joystick, but I get your point. I dont know why some of you guys are attacking MS for this... it's not like they told Sony to use the patented technology... don't forget that MS was sued too. They just settled out of court, which Sony probably could have done as well. Why they chose not to is beyond me.
    "It's an adult kiss...we'll do the rest when you get back." -Misato Katsuragi

    [size=1]Soul Calibur r0x0rz my b0x0rz!
    Actually... I don't wear boxers, but Soul Calibur r0x0rz my briefz0rz just doesn't have the same ring to it...

    **Proud owner of the Mercedes Scar**

  14. #44
    Banned Destai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ireland (In other words a B-I-G field)
    Posts
    5,146

    Default

    So immersion owns anything that rumbles?

  15. #45
    A Big Deal? Recognized Member Big D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    8,370
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    What irks me is that several companies develop the same technology, then years later someone else uses it and decides to patent it. After its already in widespread circulation, and even when they didn't invent it themselves.

    I haven't studied intellectual property law (yet), but allowing someone to patent someone else's invention and then using that patent to attack competitors who used the product before it was patented just seems wrong.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •