We could combine everyone's ideas, and start having really bad clashes over numerous policy decisions. Sort of like a rift widening between numerous staffers, where we get on each others' nerves and eventually disagreeing just for the sake of disagreeing. This could include issues like spam, profanity, professionalism, closing threads/editing posts, and borderline porn. Goodness knows we often disagree, often passionately, on plenty of issues. With a bit of melodrama, we could ham it up into a full-blown personality clash, with staffers on different sides of the fence for different issues.

Feedback would be an ideal place for this kind of thing, but virtually any GC thread on a mildly controversial topic would be fine.

The only problem would be ensuring we all know when we're just acting... we'd need a thread in Staff where we post the link to every thread where we're pretending to argue.

Examples of snarky inter-staff posting:

I know YOU have a dirty mind, Shlup, but I don't really think the rest of us want that kind of policy change.
*snip* Edit by Big D: Flaming is bad, even when a staffer does it. Especially when a Staffer does it. See you in the Warned Members List, champ.
Shouldn't we keep these whiny pissing-contests in the Staff Forum where they belong?
In spite of what our esteemed Admin says, we haven't really discussed this issue in Staff so it's still open for debate. *Reopens thread*
These kinds of low-level hostilities could easily escalate into something big and nasty and definitely attention-grabbing. If we did it right, they'd totally overlook the fact that we're approaching April Fool's day.

If we just followed our instincts and disagreed however it suited us, we'd get a pretty plausible web of resentment and disparity.