There is this question that has been bothering me for a while now. Bush *freed* Iraq from the clutches of Saddam. Now, I live in Canada, and there isn't much discussion about how a bad @$$ he was (Saddam). If he truly was a bad person, shouldn't it be good that the Co-alition forces (I apologize if I mispelled it) stopped him? And if he wasn't a bad person, then what was the reasoning for Bush to *free* Iraq?
I know about the whole nuclear bomb thing that Saddam was making and all, but there were other countries building bombs too. Why did Bush strictly make his attack on Iraq?
These questions are just out of curiosity, and I don't want to cause any harm.
