Which SA doesn't deserve.
Younger ( 0-15 )
Older ( 16-30 )
Of course not.
Why should anyone buy a game that has so many levels of customization, so many different things to do, so many ways to do them when they can buy a FIGHTING GAME! Where you do one thing! And since you'd prefur it to be a 2D one that one thing isn't even done all that well.
I was much better when I was a teenager. My little brother kicks my ass at most games.
Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
When I grow up, I want to go toBovineTrump University! - Ralph Wiggum
The older gen gamers are better because they played games longer.
I know lots of young gamers and old gamers alike. Both have their masters.
I voted older because the older games are mainly more difficult.
But now I'm having second thoughts.
Maybe it was hard to beat those older, hard-ass games for us, but we got them. (I'm in the older crowd). We're proud, we're good, and we're dangerous with our skillz at handling a tough game.
But the newer generation is far more practiced. They go through systems and games with rapid speed, they have the oppertunity to play games on a wider and more competitive scale far more often than we used to. basically, they play a FPS which is easier than an older game after all's said and done, right? But that isn't the challenge. After beating it, they hone their skills against human opponents, who will have greater capacity for difficulty levels than older computer games.
Because of internet and broader multiplayer action of modern games, it is very possible that the new generation of gamers have profound abilities in gaming due to their very practiced abilities and their new type of playing grounds, despite the fact that a game is easier. (Perhaps what I call easiness could simply translate into user compatability and options. If you know what I mean.)
I still say older gamers, but I don't speak with absolute surety.
I voted "old" because I am.
Really though, depends on the game. My dad can go for one hour on Ms. Pac-Man with one quater, and also is okay and Halo 2. But in most "modern" games, I leave him in the dust. I tie, I declare.
Boy am I an unfunny ass.
The talk about older gamers not looking for flashy graphics is wrong because im 14 and I dont really care what the games look like. As I know alot more people around the same age.
Lol that still doesnt mean that we older folks doesnt care less about graphics, you are just saying you younger ones also dont![]()
But more often than not, i hear the graphics thing from the younger players. Sure there is a standard in graphics, but i dont think its as important as most of the newer generation of gamers make them out to be since i feel primary factor is fun.
The most important factor in a game is how fun it is the gameplay to me. And most younger gamers agree with me.
You don't know most younger gamers. You don't know most younger gamers agree with you.
Please stop making similar generalizations. It's a terrible argument, and you've used it a multitude of times.
What you should be saying is: "Most younger gamers, that I know, agree with me."