o.j. simpson huh? a lovely topic. proves how much people forget. does noone remember the glove? that little prime piece of evidence which didn't fit his hand. and if it didn't fit his hand then how could he have used it? that was pretty much end of case as far as these things are concerned. that's not a legal loophole. it's the same loophole which would prevent a man with no arms being convicted of an armed bank robbery. a pretty huge loop-hole it's the second biggest one actually along side having an alaibi proving you were half way across the world at the time.

the "lynching" (the technical term escapes me) occured in britain i believe it was a year or two ago.

legal loop-holes exist for a reason, not because noone has thought to patch it up.

you can't go round killing people because you suspect them.

my previous post was based mostly on satire.