People say "War is human nature" But I have to disagree. War is, at it's roots, fighting, and killing, and dying. No human truly wants to experiance that. This is why people protest wars when the truth about said war is made apparent. (In other words, said war wasn't for a moral cause, but it was instead waged for power, money, etc.) Nobody wants to die, and it is natural to feel guilt when you kill. This is what war is, and it is wholly, one hundred percent unnatural.

However, war IS the nature of politics, and politics controls a society. It is not possible for war to be the nature of a human because we can feel, and sympathize. However, it is possible for war to be political nature because politics is a type of pseudo-existance. It exists, but yet it doesn't. It exists in the same way that numbers exist. (Have you ever seen the number two walking around before? No, you haven't, because it doesn't physically exist) Politics cannot feel, think, or sympathize. It can only analyze. Pain and suffering, love and hate, none of it matter to politics because it is lacking in them. When something lacks the ability to feel, killing is no longer a problem. If something can only analyze, killing sometimes seems like a great idea.

In the end, civilization is dominated by a pseudo existance of sorts, and that is why there is war. At least, that's how I see it. Someone please tell me I am making sense.