Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima

  1. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    scotland
    Posts
    1,938

    Default

    so does everyone understand this now? (probably not really) but as long as we all have a basic understanding of how to build a nuclear weapon we can feel safer.

  2. #17

    Default

    you got this in US history class huh? damn, i hate US history

  3. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dahlonega, GA (up in the mountains)
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Nuclear fusion can be done in the lab as well as in simple all-out destruction--however, the energy needed to contain the energy put out is so intense that by the time you would be able to channel the heat put out from the fusion into some useful purpose (such as the standard; making steam for power generation) you'll have used up more power in the containment than you'd gain from the fusion itself.

    The idea of 'cold fusion' is to somehow do it so that it makes ~less~ energy--so that we can actually do something with the energy produced. Otherwise, it's like sticking an a-bomb in the firebox of a steam-engine. Yeah, you get heat, but by the time all is said and done, your train ain't goin' nowhere.

    you got this in US history class huh? damn, i hate US history
    Actually, enough of the documents involved with the Manhattan Project were declassified that a physics student came to class one day with instructions on how to make an A-bomb. The FBI confiscated the poor kid's report, and they reclassified the documents.... I have no idea what the kid's grade was.

  4. #19

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    They have me trapped in a box.
    Posts
    3,093

    Default

    Actually, an a-bomb wouldn't be all that complex to make. In fact, I could probably construct one entirely out of parts found in my car. However, finding a supply of quality refined and processed Plutonium... that isn't going to happen. Only a few countries have the capacity to do that. But the bomb itself is actually far less advanced than your typical guided missile.
    Whore since '04. Selling my skills as an artist and writer.

    http://www.freewebs.com/acalhoun/

  5. #20
    My dream will never fade! MoonZapdos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    834

    Default

    Little boy... Nice name for a nuclear bomb =X

  6. #21
    This is not your country Killy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    This is not a country, this is earth
    Posts
    639

    Default

    udsuna, the matter to energy conversion for the hiroshima bomb was somewhere around 2%, that is if I recall correctly. Even if they had reached 100% conversion, it wouldn't have done what you described.

  7. #22
    lufia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    say what? ;]
    Posts
    242

    Default

    thanks cloud no.9 for the explaining. it was educational and fun
    finished: ff3ds, ff4,ff5, ff7,ff8,ff9,ff10,ff tactics and advance

  8. #23
    Draw the Drapes Recognized Member rubah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Now Destiny is done.
    Posts
    30,655
    Blog Entries
    21
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying Mullet
    Quote Originally Posted by rubah
    Go watch spider-man 2 again. Octavious was trying to substantiate a fusion reaction.
    I can't believe that someone used Spiderman 2 in a scientific argument.
    I knowxD We dissected it in English for the hero archetype and octavius' role as a tragic heroxD
    (and hey, if it's a way to remember the difference between fusion and fission, then spiffy!)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •