Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Down with conservatives!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dahlonega, GA (up in the mountains)
    Posts
    270

    Default

    and the one conservative gets banned while the rest aren't even edited--even when clearly pointed out--and that's not bias?
    :D The two conservatives get banned.

    And as I noted in my Revelations upon Forum Policy post, inflammatory, crude, or just plain hateful statements are fairly common, from the left side of the aisle, and suffer no consequence.

    Like I've also noted, our fair and impartial mods have an amazingly short temper when it comes to such comments from conservatives... and a noticably longer fuse when much worse comments come from the other side of the aisle. Looks like he's got his eye on you too, buddy.

    As for the comment itself--"A lot of people here would just like to see America and Americans hurt" translates to "Big D, specifically, and others besides him would like to see civilians harmed with chemical weapons"? Which translator are we using to decipher this, here? I hope I don't ever log on here drunk and type "SAG FAKLjasdfjiuh asdhf;kl poiurien ltkm kjryeiuanf a'jf;adsfj!!!!" or else D will probably be calling the police on me for terroristic threats...

    The fact that others 'get away with it' is not an excuse for anything you do, and I am tired of people using it.
    Strange, but I didn't see 'others get away with it' as an excuse (it must be hidden in his post like the chemical weapons thing was). From what I gather, he was asking just why he got banned (Which I got from the part where he said "I want to figure out why I was banned." Although that may actually mean something else--probably something like "Big D, you want to use chemical weapons on me!")

    Sasquatch's question, as mine was before it, was why comments from one side of the political spectrum are judged "inflammatory" or "flaming" and punished with an immediate ban while comments of equal severity or far worse are allowed to pass without comment. Considering the ridiculous idea that the comment for which he was banned was actually something that should be punished at all, much less with a three-week ban, his question is still completely valid.

    Sasquatch... No racism comparisons (especially since you'll probably get busted for calling Big D a KKK member). That's for the other guys to pull, man. The forum administrators (or one of them, at least) are handing out bans with an extreme and obvious double-standard. This is not racism, nor is it as bad as lynchings and racial crimes, nor does this have anything to do with the KKK. It's an act of bias and double-standard, something completely different.
    Last edited by The Redneck; 05-03-2005 at 06:28 AM. Reason: Had the wrong name for who did the banning

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •