Better safe than sorry. This is something that both Clinton and Bush Sr. should have worked towards so it wouldn't be so bad to keep cracking down now.
Not when it comes to crippling ourselves over with non-existant threats.

I would like to hear why it is junk science anyways.
Because the evidence doesn't match up to the theory. Computer models indicate a warming trend, but while actual temperature has risen in some places, it's fallen in others. stratospheric temperature, for example, has been below the average since 1994 (and at various times before that) while many others (such as Cordova, Alaska, which has cooled, Eastman, Georgia (Close by my hometown), which shows a slight cooling trend, likewise Santa Cruz, Californee--I could spend all night throwing links up) show either no change or a history of climate cooling. In fact, in the 1970's, Global Cooling was the big scare-tactic, although its proponents have switched without slowing down to the opposite end of the spectrum.

As for opponents of Global Warming, here's a more detailed explanation of the myths regarding global warming, as well as a list of professors and scientists who discount the theory. It also might be of interest to check the Hiedelburg Appeal, the OISM Petition, and the Leipzig Declaration.

it will not cripple your economy. it will in fact bolster it.
Shutting down a sizable percentage of our businesses will bolster our economy? Oooookayyy.......

tut tut redneck you made a mistake. the human rights charter actually applies to all humans hence it's name. the us signed it and so is obliged to keep it.
Granted. War sucks, don't it?

lets say a man who's door you kick in in islamabad
The guy who trained with Al-Qaeda? My sympathy simply does not overflow.

breach of it is breach of human rights we hung people at nuremburg for the same thing.
All I can say is that I'm disgusted. Do you really hate America that much?

section 805 declares that expert advice or assistance can be declared as material support to terrorism. that breaches the 1st and 5th ammendemnts
False. Advising and assisting in a crime are considered conspiracy. What's good enough for murder is good enough for terrorism.

505 allows the government to obtain customer records and this breaches the 1st and fourth ammendments
Except these records still require a warrant--which the Constitution allows government to do if they have a warrant. Again, false.

also the gag orders in the act are also illegal under us law.
I'm probably going to wish I didn't, but let's hear about these gag orders.

imilarities between nazi germany and the us in easy steps.

the reichstag and 9-11. both countries passed act following to restrict liberties. both broke their own constitution. both were passed to protect against a threat that was pushed hard in propaganda.
First, as already noted, the US did not "break" its own constitution, nor was Al-Qaeda "pushed hard" in propoganda--after murdering 3000 people, there wasn't much need for it. Seems like you stepped in something you shouldn't have.

camps have been set up in both countries to contain suspects without trial indefinetly. (i don't refer to death camps but concentration camps for communist before the wannasse conference)
We're not containing "suspects" we're containing prisoners caught with a terrorist organization. Again, false. but third time's the charm, right?

both ignored an internation governing body.
Except that we followed 17 UN resolutions regarding Iraq. But maybe the fourth time?

both had international support for military actions until an unlawful invasion.
First, no unlawful invasion was involved. Second, we still have international support. I'm not hoping much for #5, here....

both allowed people to hand over communists/terrorists and place them in camps. (can someone help me with the word for this? i've been struggling with it for a week)
I was right. You do see the difference, I hope, between terrorists that we caught with the help of informants and people Hitler jailed for their political views? Well, apparently, not when it comes to America you don't.

moazzam begg actually never trained in afghanistan.
The source I named already disputed this.

you obviously didn't read those programs otherwise the reasons for the jihad as stated at the time and not warped afterwards would be clear for you. when i post links for you which you ask for please show me the courtesy of at least flicking through it.
I would say the same about the wikipedia link regarding begg... except that you posted that, but it still would have been nice if you'd looked at it.

And I obviously did read the programs--did you notice the parts of my post that were in quotation marks? The reasons for the Jihad, as stated at the time, (as in in OBL's own declaration) is that America is not muslim and won't let them kill Jews. When you make some wild accusation please at least show me the courtesy of looking at what I posted before drawing inferences from it.

the same for the evidence against a true structure for al qaeda.
That some work of propoganda claims so?

ecause that documentatu doesn't say what you like it's anti-(german) american propaganda probably spread around by those nazi (communist jews) terrorists and liberals.
You know what? I'm tired, I'm getting bored with having to repeat common sense over and over again, and by trying to compare me to Hitler you have admitted that you don't have a leg to stand on--so I'm done until I feel a bit less disgusted.