ah the jolly old argument.... he had stockpiles of chemical weapons (which noone could find apparently). so he really had plans to launch a petri dish of buetilinuem with the missle that struggled to get outwith his own border. be afraid be very afraid.

and those terrorist links all those message he took the time to not reply to. yep that was a great connection full of plans and evil conspiracy that was. and churchil was a commie...........

and why doesn't america defend the sudanese people? why don't the defend the koreans? the burmese? singapore? russia? chine? ethiopia? saudi arabia? israel? turkey? uzbekistan? algeria? egypt?

yeah cos those people don't need defending at all. in fact in uzbekistan america hasa lovely little air base. how's the for support to a man with nasty habit of boiling people. yeah a joyous place to live in. no need to defend them.

defend people against a true genocide not one which is "kinda like one but not quite" like in sudan.

and considering that the UN said it better take longer finding WMD because it wasn't exactly sure if sadamme had them or not. and oh my god neither could america. then yeah the UN is so corrupt because they lunged into a war incriminating all soldeirs who fight in it. those dirty UN people and their lies...............

and while i'm at it. if a mob boss buys a jury and is found innocent, then yes he is innocent. he was tried in a court of his peers. or would you just like to send them off to egypt like bush allows other suspects to be?