FF VII was never fiished Aerth was to be (ya know)

[Squall of SeeD]

furthermore she was to die at the ice cave not the forgotin capital. on

http://www.ff7citadel.com/secrets/s_errors.shtml
their is much "proof"
i never noticed the error in the game. But they are not really errors of the game was never complted?
why does seperoth have no cloves at the top. ANd gloves at the bottom of the screen when he kills ares. And the background has no capital in it. so she was to die later in the game not in disk 1!!

That's hardly proof of any such thing. The article you're speaking of (this is the link for it, rather than the link you provided: http://www.ff7citadel.com/secrets/sa_seen4.shtml ) has several errors, or things that were not considered:

1) The light that is seen behind the Sephiroth form is shining on Cloud's face before the Sephiroth form ever appears.

2) This same light was completely surrounding Aerith.

3) The camera smoothly transitions upward from Aerith's positon on the altar in the City of the Ancients to the area above from which the Sephiroth form descends.

4) Aerith can, indeed, be seen while the Sephiroth form is still without gloves.

5) The scene is full of errors:

Depending on the version one is playing, when approaching the altar, she either has her back to the stairs or is facing them. In any event, when Cloud gets up there and holds his sword above her, she's facing the stairs. As the FMV of her death begins, she is still facing the stairs. When the Sephiroth form descends, it isn't wearing gloves, nor is there glass dome around the altar any longer. When Aerith is skewered, not only is the Sephiroth form now wearing gloves, but the stairs are behind both Aerith and the Sephiroth form. When the FMV ends, the Sephiroth form is now facing the stairs and there is a glass dome around the altar once again.


As far as everything around the altar being dark, that was obviously to put the Sephiroth form and Aerith as the focus of the scene.


The only "evidence" for such a theory is Aerith's "I'm sick of this" line at the Great Glacier, which hardly makes sense as a piece of evidence in the first place since Yuffie and Cid can have lines earlier in the game than one is supposed to have acquired them.

[Big D]

The FFVII Citadel is chock-full of unsubstantiated rumours. Just looking at their 'errors' page, many of the 'mistakes' - such as Tseng's age - can be explained away quite easily.

If you believed everything you read at the FFVII Citadel, you could revive Aeris using tissues, then get her to ride a silver chocobo into space and defeat Meteor in battle, before returning to the Planet to confront Mako Weapon, Cheese Weapon and Octagon Weapon. It's ridiculous.

[Fire_Emblem776]

That "secret cave" is really just the bottom of the materia cliff where Sephiroth and WEAPON are entombed. There's no apparent reason for why Aeris' theme is played there.

but i want it to be true!! I miss her i leveld her up so much! And she dies after one boss. I useed her limit once on a boss....

ahh conspiracy, the death scene the ghost
the debug room *sigh*
we will never know

[Squall of SeeD]

That "secret cave" is really just the bottom of the materia cliff where Sephiroth and WEAPON are entombed. There's no apparent reason for why Aeris' theme is played there.

but i want it to be true!! I miss her i leveld her up so much! And she dies after one boss. I useed her limit once on a boss....

ahh conspiracy, the death scene the ghost
the debug room *sigh*
we will never know

We already know, emblem. Read this Thread: Linkage.

And for an expanded debunking that touches upon things like that ridiculus "ghost," read the first page of this very Thread we're in now, or refer to my FFVII Analysis site: Linkage.

[Ageless_Bum]

An interesting point to be considered is how some will stand in the face of overhwelming evidence and excellent logic to uphold their view. Im mean this in no way to praise one person over the other. But, from a strictly unbiased perspective, SoS (through this post and his original on the subject) has made the stronger case. Not however to say he is right or wrong (remember im trying to stand unbiased in this) He has just provided much more solid evidence. This however has not detered the die hard beleivers, as inevitably we will be treated to more threads on this very subject. The point this makes me ask is "what about this situation sparks such amazing drive in people?" Understand that i do not wish to detract from this thread or change its subject, but merely to post a musing of mine. For my part i would say this points to an overly enthralling character creation on the part of the game makers, but this cannot be the only part. There have been many other deaths in games with characters that we should conceivably be close to as well, but a discussion with the staying power of this magnitude has not arisen over those. What other factor creates this desire to prove Aerith's resurection was intended