Then you'd get trampled over by another country with a much stronger army. A small, ill-equipped army for show is little better than having no army at all.
Last time I checked, Japan are not allowed to have an army stronger then for defense only, what means that many nations have a stronger army.
They're not being over run.
Norway's army is less strong then the US army, yet this nation is not being over run by the US.

I'd have an army for defence untill everyone have agreed uppon removing the army. If everyone keep it for defence, there's no point in keeping it.
Takes us right back to socialism, which we've already pointed out doesn't work.
We didnt agree on that.
Destroy money? Destroying money effectively eliminates any incentive to work.
Yet there are other communists that does this work for humanity today. Yet we have volunteers, we have friendly people today. Of course people would do their best. It's for their own intrest, tough, to see how good they can push themselves. Every good invention has been invented for the good if the people. Einstein didt think for money. Doctros save lifes, if they did this for the money they would all be brutal egoistic people, really, that didnt care about the lifes they saved. Money has this influence on us, it gives us greed, greed is unhealthy.
And the abolishment of cash is communism, not socialism.
compensation for the work they do.
So now we need items to tell us how hard we work? now you should realize how low our race has fallen. Before, we'd be happy just to hear that we're doing great.

Do you really want to have a job you hate just for the income? I gues you'd be more happy if you can take whatever job you'd like.
I've heard a story of someone who was in a communist country. They went to eat at a restaurant. After eating, they noticed no bill came. Eventually, they gravitated towards the counter and asked. The owners simply replied that they were given the same amount of materials to make the food every day. They had no real reason to try to collect on the bill (the money would be taken by the government to propogate the system anyways) and they had no real reason to try their hardest to make the food good.
Some
Communist country? wow, that story must be atleast 200 years old. Not even that... 1000 years, maby?
There has not been a communist country in a long, long time.
You're takling about a socialist country, in wich there are many alternatives. We have Stalins USSR, even communists are opposed to hes brutal regime. Lenin, a bit better, but to strict for my oppioin.

Castro? now that's more like it, he's still strict, tough.

Ether way, they had no real reason? that means that the change has come to quick. People need to be tought that people are more important then cash, that they have to try harder just for the fun of it.

And he didnt want to collect the income? what means he's an egoist that didnt care about the enviroment, and the free health care. This would change as soon as he turned sick and would need health care.

So if someone disagrees they go to jail? Some utopia.
I'm talking about those who brutally disagree, with violence and rebellive moves.
He couldnt force people to follow him becouse they would have nothing to gain on that and nothing to lose if they didnt, unless he killed them or theyr family, however he's be forcing them with him, what means that they'd turn away as soon as they could.

We do NOT have the right to tell ANYBODY how they should think. Do you have any idea how easily that lends itself to being abused? We start with that, OK, things are going great. But wait! There's this other way of thinking that doesn't conform to our narrow vision of what the world needs. Time to outlaw that! Hey, maybe we can get a group together, let's call them the "Thought Police", to incarcerate or "reeducate" everyone who isn't thinking right. Isn't that a great idea!?
I'm not saying that we shal outlaw it, I'm saying that we should change our culture into this belief that people are all people, foregin or not, and that we shal allways judge people differently. If he's Italian, he's not neccecaraly into soccer, becouse he's another person. If there's a jew, he should be respected, being a Jew isnt a chrime.
I'm saying that this kind of teaching should be tought in school, to small kids, I'm not forcing anyone to go with this at this stage, not even aftert. If a few of those kids with nazie parents turn into Nazies afterwards, I will not care, becouse atleast some of those with nazie parents will not be nazies anymore. The children of these nazies will then go tought the same, and we'll filter even another layer of possible nazies. This way, we'll eventually take it down.