Okay, It is Final Fantasy, But I still feel that it shouldn't be in the numeric series. The CG thing is neither here nor there, it doesn't make FF an FF game. Xenosaga had more CG that all FFs combined, so theres proof CG does not = FF.
FFXI sounds fun, but it can not be beaten. It doesn't have built in drama, you have to basically create it. As for under developed characters, I agree with squareSOFT on this. There aren't any highly developed characters in FFXI. I can't say to you, "When Garamonde killed the cerberus, it totally took me by surprise!" because you don't know who Garamonde is, unless you play in the server i do, and know who that player is. So, sure you can remember a lot of other human players, but that doesn't mean the game has memorable characters for everyone. Also, FFI was a last ditch effort to save the company and at the time RPGs were virtually non-existant. You can't seriously balme them for having under develpped characyers on the NES. For god's sake, even the most famous of NES characters had no development, Mario, Samus, Simon Belmont.... At that time, character development didn't mean as much as gameplay. Now in this era we need dramatic storylines and character development. As for VIII, Sutre they didn't have in depth storyline, but when i say Irvine, you all know who I mean. When i say Garamonde, you haven't the slightest idea who the hell that is. (acctually its Cyan's last name, but you get what I mean.)