Basically the City officials are now in a position where they know whats economically best for a city, and the judges do not, therefore, that is why residential and small businesses can be forcefully removed, for city profit.
Local officials, not federal judges, know best in deciding whether a development project will benefit the community, justices said.
But the thing that I have to question is that these judges enforce and protect citizens rights and 'property', not something a local offical is qualified for.