Quote Originally Posted by Endless
If you see in absolutes - it's either good, or it's evil, no middle ground - then you are just as a fundamentalist as any religious fanatic.
Yep.

About force and freedom, if someone goes to steal your property, what are you going to do? Let him go away with your car, or are you going to fight? What if the government turned into a dictatorship, would you flee, or would you fight for your freedom? If someone was threatening to kill you, would you stand and wait for him to pull the trigger, or would you defend yourself?
The police is using force everyday to maintain your freedoms, by arresting (and in some cases killing) those who try to step on it. Same goes with the army when it defends one's country. You need force to retaliate against those who initiate force against you.
That's retaliatory force, which I support. No man may intiate force on another in order to seek a value (whether it be my money, my education, my freedom or my life).

Edit: I'd like to see your definition of "good" and "evil", then you tell me why everyone should agree with it, and if everyone does or ever will.
Oh, they won't. Look at the mass murder of today's world and you'll find people always attempt to use force on another indvidual, or mass of them.

As for "my" definition of good and evil, to put it in the simplest terms possible, good is that which furthers your life (rationally); evil is that which destroys it.