Originally Posted by TisWas
Nope, like I said, according to law, it just requires a "sex act involving a minor". Nothing in the definition makes exceptions based upon the minor's willingness to participate, or for that matter, who can't be prosecuted if possessing.
Oh, so it was an overkill play-along hypothetical "wink-wink, nudge-nudge" thing. I thought you were mocking my use of second-tense, instead of first or third, which is a BIG no-no when dealing with grammar. We could also get a "big no-no" by breeding you with boris. Which is probably also illegal.



It's only if it's someone else.
Reply With Quote