Bledsoe has a 90% chance of putting up positive points. I'm just contemplating if that's worth gambling on being tied for first place. More than likely, I'll start both.
Bledsoe has a 90% chance of putting up positive points. I'm just contemplating if that's worth gambling on being tied for first place. More than likely, I'll start both.
Well, it worked for baseball (both things).Originally Posted by Raistlin
Very true (edit: about the cutthroat thing, not about you winning every time).
That Westbrook rushing TD should seal things for me, unless Terry Glenn goes nuts in the second half. I expect no less, actually.
Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
When I grow up, I want to go toBovineTrump University! - Ralph Wiggum
Might want to look into Samkon Godu, too, for the Packers. Especially against the Vikings rushing defense.
Champ used number two waiver priority to get Gado, a bold and wise move, it seems.
Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
When I grow up, I want to go toBovineTrump University! - Ralph Wiggum
A friend of mine in my other league (a Packers fan) picked up Gado and started him this week over Warrick Dunn. He was nuts all yesterday ("Samkon Gado!").
Though anyone who can pick up 100 yards, 3 TDs in a game is definitely worth a look.
the thing is, it was pretty clear he would have a good game against the Falcons, who are not very good at stopping the run. It's not like the Packers have a lot of other options besides Favre throwing deep. Gado has a good chance of tearing up the Vikings too. There's a reason I used my waiver on him and then played him over much more 'sure thing' Greg Jones (who also rushed for 100 and scored a TD).
And you got a dead-on average game out of both.
The star shines bright in north Texas. It's about time one of these games went our way for a change.
Yeah, Bledsoe kinda sucked, except for that beautiful pass to Glenn in the endzone. He also had a really good deep pass to Glenn earlier, but Glenn slowed down halfway through his route for some reason, so couldn't catch up.
McNabb just sucked more, and gave the game away. The Eagles played better than the Cowboys though, as for once they had a decent running game. Absolutely no passing game though, which wasn't helped by McNabb sucking royally and making horrible decisions.
TO would have caught that pass at the end of the game to set up a makeable field goal.
For the record, my computers broken. For the record.
Good thing he wasn't there, then, 'cause with 4 seconds left and no TOs left, if Brown had caught that ball, the game would've been over.
But I think Philly wouldn't have been in that positition to begin with if they had had Owens.
There was about 14 seconds left when he almost caught that one.
Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
When I grow up, I want to go toBovineTrump University! - Ralph Wiggum
Philly wouldn't be in this position if they'd just recognized that if you sign Owens, you have to be willing to coddle him and ignore his outbursts.
TO's good, sure, but he's too damn full of himself. He's not in high demand anymore, because every team knows he's a pain in the ass. He'll play well when he wants to, but bitch and moan and throw hissy fits when something doesn't go his way -- like the team not winning every game, him not being recognized for every catch, him not getting "enough" balls thrown to him, him not playing under a "suitable" QB, etc. etc. etc. Good riddance, I say they're better off without him, like the Cubs were without Sammy Sosa.
I just remember thinking "what a stupid pass; if he'd have caught that, time would've run out!"
TO's the best wide receiver in the NFL right now, and Philly doesn't have a chance without him.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
