Quote Originally Posted by Sephiroth.
Quote Originally Posted by Cuchulainn
I don't think it would be a bad idea. Many democracies have unlimited terms. If the voters want the same man again & again is it not undemocratic to not let them vote for him?

I see why it is there, to stop a camouflaged dictatorship, but Ireland, the UK and many others have never had this bar on terms & as far as I know no European country has had a dictator since democracy was introduced to that nation & STAYED a democracy. That would happen only in corrupt governments and corrupt voting & the only major power to have it's voting questioned to a large degree was...well America. It serves a purpose in fragile democracies & corrupt administrations but surely America is neither, is it?
Couldn't put it better myself I agree.
thats the hting though america is a really kinda fake/corperate society.Those commercials.I mean there ar emore commercials on one US channel then on 3 canadian channels combined.Anyway heres the thing and the problem.
these corporations took it to there advantage to have the two party system and make the 3rd parties useless.They took it to there advantage to make sure anything bush sends passes.Now if you remove the terms of the president to lifetime then things get worse.

You see in america these corporations keep you busy scared of crap that doesn't exist and no one in the US has a brain because its been drained by the media through brain washing.