Agreed. I tend to take a stance on any given subject, but you always have to remain dedicated to the facts.Originally Posted by Raistlin
For example, if I was that believer and went back and found absolutely no proof that there were any other nautiloids, I wouldn't claim that I was right for the sake of being right. Same goes with people who think that they are right no matter what; I think a person can take a stance and change their mind later if they are proven wrong.
Neutality is not necessarily bad, but to me it sounds like a sort of "moral agnosticism". Or replace moral with any word relevant. Sort of throwing up your hands and saying, "I don't know!"
It's why I don't agree with neutral countries in a world war. Give me a break.
