...then i though about a curved tax system. where peple earning more are taxed higher so it gets harder and harder to earn more money. thus closing the rich poor gap slightly.
I, personally, am ashamed to even hear that.
Do you have any idea how many people that would hurt - not just the rich? What about the 5,000 minimum-wage employees of one big businessman, that he would have to lay off if the government came up with even MORE arbitrary antitrust laws to regulate his income? How about all the distributors that rely on that business for product; they would have to lay off employees and cut costs as well. Hurting the rich businessmen and the investors hurts everyone, as they support entire communities. But oh my god, some people have earned more than others - they must be stripped of it! Income is not equal because minds, because ability are not equal. In a free society, the better go to the top. The top is currently filled with corrupt, bribing businessmen precisely because the government is able to regulate them.
I am against any sort of forced income tax. I would gladly hand over a portion of my income for a basic federal government(army, police, law courts), but I am against paying for things I don't agree with. I do not agree with public education, which is so full of flaws that could be easily fixed by privatization. I am against nationalized health insurance of any sort, I'm against government-controlled social security, and against basically any sort of government-intervention into businesses.
