the businessman would only cut jobs if he valued his one over blown riches more than his business. cuuting jobs = less employees = less people to build stuff = less stuff = less money. if he is simple becomign more effeceint then he would do this anyway.

we are regulating the companies income. we are regulating the owners income. both are seperate. lets look at where i work. people pay money to come in. deducted from this are the wages, elec, gas, maintenance costs etc. and the owners pay is what is left. this end part we can tax.

it's what happens with small businesses as well and the self evaluation. if i remember for self evaluation you need to show the net profit which goes into your pocket after all other costs. then of course you have corporate tax (which i proposed abolishing)

we are not talking about stripping people of all they have earned. tax has never done that. making it harder for people to become super-rich with abolsutely no purpose for the money is hardly the worst prospect.