What? This isn't indirect cause of terrorism(such as funding or arming terrorists), but indirect incitement. What does that even mean? If I go on TV and make fun of the middle-east, and terrorists come and bomb my house, would I be guilty of "indirect incitement to terrorism?""indirect incitement to terrorism"
I'd like to know the full statute on this one. But they probably left this intentionally vague(like the Patriot Act) so it can mean whatever-the-hell they want."acts prepatory to terrorism"
Also, how could you judge they were preparing to commit a "terrorist act?" I mean, plenty of people have guns, and a lot of terrorists never even used guns(9/11?). Is getting pilot training now an "act preparatory to terrorism?" It seems to me that this is trying to outlaw thinking about commiting a terrorist act - or, along with the first, doing anything which could remotely support a terrorist act, whether you know it or not.
While this sounds reasonable(at least, the "at home" part), what constitutes "terrorist training?"and to outlaw terrorist training at home or abroad.
It seems to me the White House throws around phrases like "supporting terrorism" and "training terrorism" and "indirect incitement to terrorism" without giving them any specific, objective definitions, in which case they are merely arbitrary collections of letters with no real meaning.
