Well...someone had to do it.
1.Many threads in that forum have only one post from the staff, the last one.And one thing, certain spam threads are archived, and some are not. Do you see MAPS in the archive? No, because it doesn't deserve to be archived. Does wankers need to be archived either? I believe it doesn't. It was at one point, but it was briefly moved out, and I believe it should stay out. A good way for a spam thread to be even considered getting archived is when the staff takes some involvement. Since wankers didn't have many staff involvement, it doesn't get archived.
2.
http://www.eyesonff.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36562I don't care if it "deserves" to be archived. It doesn't. Why? Because it is 100% pure nonsense that went overboard within a few hours.
3.Ha. That, as many before me have pointed out, is not for you to decide.And it's not the kind of spam I would say is deemed to be archived.
4.
Read above.Well, it doesn't matter. I don't find the kind of spam in wankers to be very tasteful.
5.Read the above two posts and this to boot. Just because you get uncomfortable around the word blowjob doesn't people will stop using the word. People pass out at the sight of blood, yet there are graphic pictures. Get a grip. You're not gonna block your ears every time someone says a naughty word.Not when "blowjobs" and such were posted. When I found "blowjobs" within the first couple posts, I was immediately turned off by the thread. Sorry. I don't believe that thread should be archived.



