Which of these theories fit better the storyline?

[Skyblade]

I don´t ignore questions.
The majority of people don´t matter in representing the thruth.
I proofed that Julia was Ulti.
You proofed that Laguna and Raine were Squall´s fathers.

To say that I don´t proof mine and you proofed yours is just to state that graphical details were not as valid as dialogues.
But this is not proofed anywhere.Endpoint.
You just purposedly say they don´t make sense but they do.They make as sense as LRS.No one has proofed me wrong yet.
Proof to me that LRS makes more sense that Julia = Ulti and I will shut up.

It didn´t matter the quantity of evidences but the quality.

That Destai and Crazy bay man guy showed you J=U was wrong.

No,they don´t.They just post alternate possibilities for the theory.
I can do the same with the LRS theory to show ít weren´t better than mine.

And Sir Bahamut that was a real bad comparison.

In WWW 2 we had script(History books) and graphical(arqueological) evidences.

On FF8 the script(Julia is dead) and the graphical evidences contradict each other.
So just one of them could be right.

And WWW2 was not a game my friend.It can be showed with scientifical evidence.But in a game you can´t do it.

Ok, this is starting to piss me off now. FE, if you want to feed us your cracked off theories, fine. But learn to spell! You haven't proven a damned thing. You have shown in this thread that you do ignore questions (and I bet you're going to go further by ignoring this and saying that I am just lying or that I don't understand). What's more, a single picture that looks nothing like either of the two characters that you claim it to be is nowhere near the amount of evidence supporting the LRS theory. Ulti's dress isn't red. We don't see her actually playing the organ (an arguement I note you dropped since my last mention of it), so that similarity is gone. And there isn't a damned thing in the game that gives even the slightest indication that J=U. And, while it may be hard to get this through your thick skull, when 1,000 people who have seen just as much evidence as you have argue with you, that should clue you in to something. Now, if you have seen a video for an FFVIII sequel or something that the rest of us haven't, then you could argue that your crackpot theories are correct and that we are all wrong (even then, you would have to prove that it wasn't some new twist thought up by Square, rather than part of the first game). But going purely off of what the game has showed us, you don't know any more than any of the rest of us, and from your posts, I'd say you know less. I've been accused of looking too deeply into games before (there's a thread dedicated to one of my theories in the FFTA forum), but this is total bull$#!+. "It doesn't matter if it doesn't look exactly like her because it is a portrait, not a photograph"?! So I suppose that it doesn't matter that it doesn't look a thing like either character, does it? I've already given an explanation (which you just ignored, choosing instead to focus on the least plausible of my theories; one that was in there in an attempt to demonstrate your own stupidity to you) as to why Ulti would have that painting in her castle. Unlike your ridiculous theory, mine also explains why she has all the other pictures, even though none of them are pictures of her (another thing about my post that you IGNORED, despite your reassurance that you don't ignore things). So please, stop and think before you post again. Oh, and don't forget to learn to spell.

EDIT: The graphical evidence and the script don't contradict each other, since nothing in your graphical evidence suggests that the picture is either Julia or Ulti. What was the name of the painting? "Red Clothes". Not "Ruler of the Castle".