Future, something you fail to understand about theories about storylines is that they need more than internal consistency (which is to say, consistency among themselves). They need consistency when applied to the previously established facts of the storyline, and they cannot bring in information that is not suggested or implied by the story. They have to use what is already there to explain something else about what is already there.

When a theory has to contradict previously established facts or previously unimplied concepts in order to hold internal consistency, it is not a valid theory. It may be consistent with itself, but if it is inconsistent with the story that it is about, it is rendered invalid.


P.S. Lying to try to cover your ass doesn't make you look any more credible.