I never attacked anyone, I merely stated what I could have said if i stooped as low as you in your 'you support terrorists' statement. Don't attack and then play the victim when someone counters with a stronger attack.


Quote Originally Posted by War Angel
Again, wrong. Except 'freedom fighters', these aren't buzz-words. They have a distinct meaning. A guerilla force is a non-governmental force that fights against an organised army to achieve certain goals, almost always political (such as independence). A terrorist organisation often strives for the same goals, but tries to achieve them in different methods - a terrorist organisation targets and hits civilians, in order to create pressure on the opposing government and\or people. The IRA does that, as far as I know (care to prove me wrong on this?).

Certainly, give me an example where the IRA deliberately targeted civilians in an effort to simply kill civilians, i'm not ignorant enough to believe it could never have happened so give me one & I'll look into it. Don't ignore my quest either, you are missing my whole point by doing so. Every military organisation, legal or illegal has killed civilians. I'm not talking about accidental death or such. I'm talking either a calculated collateral or direct, deliberate attacks. Again, don'tm ignore this point, you seem to be doing so, so I've reitterated it.

Lastly, your overtly simplistic view on Terrorism & Gurrillas is complwtely off centre and wrong. Terrorist & Guerrilla Warfare stretch way beyond the spheres of Freedom Fighting alone. There are many reasons for both. There are Guerrillas in Colombia, Indonesia, Chile etc who's aim is drug related, political or even tribal. You cannot simplify those words to mere 'Freedom Fighters'. Lastly Al Queda, they are not freedom fighters, the PLO were, they aren't.

Don't say I'm wrong, please, I back up every word I say, you generalise in obne sentence answers explaining nothing about fact. Everything you say is mere un-learned view point, care to prove me wrong on that?