let them roll with it. rockstar are doing what they do best (got to love us scots). they had a pop with the original gta. the place was in up-roar. but it died down with london and gta 2. they realeased 3 in a 3d world and it sparked some more out rage. but it was short lived. so they made state of emergency. that kicked up a fuss. then manhunt. now did that get people talking. but the drama dropped again.

so rockstar decided to hide a lovely sex game in sa and waitt for people to find it knowing fine well that someone will and that it will cause all sorts of controversy. and too keep the controversy ball rolling like they have done since the original gta they are releasing bully.

why do they do this? it makes a whole heap of money. it's very cheap publicity. people though that the snuff themed manhunt would be the death of them. but it didn't and some people purely bought the game because they thought it was going to be banned.

make something controversial and it will sell. rockstar will do one of two things. either make a game so controversial it will break them. this is unlikely as it will probably sell like hot cakes and make them stronger. they might get sued and lose and go bust. that's possible. or they will continue to push boundries bit by bit until the world is the game developers oyster. and that will probably be what happens.

we've had worse filmed released than bully. they should be treated equally.