Quote Originally Posted by Cuchulainn
1. Fact is, and truth is, I can't be bothered providing links that will be instantly discredited. I've made that mistake in the past, I'm not going to waste my time again.

2. Most of what I know is from books. How on earth can I provide links to that? Lastly, I know my history. I do not feel an overwhelming urge to prove myself to anyone here.

3. My rebuttals were what they were, rebuttals. If I showed any form of persona attacks it was in response.

4. This is an online debate, 'put up or shut up' is a hilarious statement. I've stated my knowledge on a subject, if you want facts. READ YOURSELF.

5. 3 against 1 and I still owned you all
You are really full of yourself, did you know that?

1. You claimed you could provide links if we requested it. The fact that you didn't indicates that you in fact have no information to provide.

2. We know our history too. You still have outright ignored every single argument against you. As to book knowledge, I have no problem with you using that. Supply ISBN numbers and/or quote passages. If you actually have any to quote, that is.

3. Kind of pointless to argue about this one, since I doubt you'll listen to any point I make about the difference between my attacks and yours.

4. Exactly, it's an online debate. But, the fact is, it's still a debate. If you have no desire to prove your points, you shouldn't have made them in the first place. If you don't care what we think of you, then you are continuing this discussion for the sole purpose of being inflammatory. Which is against the rules.

5. 3 against 1, and you still get delusions of victory.